2001 is a bit different in this respect, because there really isn't any kind of invading force in this movie. If anything, the largest explicit threat comes from the computer, but that's a man-made problem, not an alien one. In fact, holy muffins, there are no aliens in this movie. There is that weird monolith thing (or...things?), but according to Wikipedia (yeah, that's right) that's an extraterrestrial machine, not an actual alien. The absence of aliens is pretty damn uncommon for a sci-fi flick.
There is another major difference that I felt helped make this movie stand out amongst others, and that's the first section with the monkeys. Which, by the way, was either my favorite or my second-favorite part (tied with the computer drama). I totally could have watched an entire film about monkeys evolving. And it was just so interesting that 2001 started with a look back to our past and making it sci-fi, rather than just starting with a futuristic view of the world.
There is still the idea of a "warning" present in the film, I believe. Or maybe not even a warning, but I did get the sense of a "look at where relying too much on technology/evolution will lead you - murder" message in some parts of the film. But the end makes it seem more like a natural, cyclical progression - starting with the Dawn of Man and ending with a new Dawn of Man - rather than an outright warning. Kind of complicated, though, so I could be way off.
Nicely done. It is interesting that the film is not so much about aliens, but the human response to the mystery of alien intelligence, and what it seems to offer. I do have to wonder about the "natural" progression of man evolving into a Star Baby. Maybe we accept this as natural in a science fiction film, but it seems rather like a drastic shift away from human nature toward a new nature.
ReplyDelete